Execution Plans

Sometimes when you do GROUP BY, the order of the columns does matter. For example, these two SELECT queries produce different results: Transact-SQL CREATE INDEX Location_DisplayName ON dbo.Users(Location, DisplayName); SELECT TOP 100 Location, DisplayName, COUNT(*) AS Duplicates FROM dbo.Users GROUP BY Location, DisplayName ORDER BY Location, DisplayName; SELECT TOP 100 DisplayName, Location, COUNT(*) AS Duplicates…

An interesting question came in on PollGab. DBAmusing asked: If a query takes 5-7s to calculate the execution plan (then executes <500ms) if multiple SPIDS all submit that query (different param values) when there’s no plan at start, does each SPID calc the execution plan, one after the other after waiting for the prior SPID…

Every weekday during the month of October, one of the modules from my Fundamentals classes will be absolutely free to watch. But you gotta watch it that day – you snooze, you lose. This week is Fundamentals of Query Tuning. Last week’s class had hands-on labs you had to follow, but this week’s doesn’t. You’re welcome…

A reader posted a question for Office Hours: Hi Brent, What is your take on Hugo Kornelis’s explanation of execution plan naming. As her his explanation, estimated exec plan is simply an execution plan whereas actual execution plan = execution plan+run-time stats. Do you agree that the naming is flawed and confusing? – Yourbiggestfan I…

How do we get this to show up in an execution plan: Without having an index seek or index scan operation on the same table? Take any copy of the Stack Overflow database and write a query that will produce a key lookup on the Users, table, but it’s not allowed to have an index…

I wish we got a yellow bang on execution plans when SQL Server was making up an estimate out of thin air. I’ll give you an example: if you compare two columns on the same table, looking to find rows where they’re equal, SQL Server has a hard-coded estimate that 10% of the rows will…

When you see “index seek” on an execution plan, that doesn’t mean SQL Server is jumping to exactly the row you’re looking for. It only means that SQL Server is seeking on the first column of the index. This is especially misleading on indexes where the first column isn’t very selective. To explain, I’ll take…

In my free How to Think Like the Engine class, we start out by measuring query performance using logical reads. That’s the number of 8KB data pages that SQL Server has to read in order to find your query’s results. That’s the measure I use the most because generally speaking, the less data your server…

When you execute a query, the database server has to figure out things like: Which table to process first Which index to use on that table Whether to seek on that index or scan it Which table to process next How to join the data between those two tables When to sort the data For…

If you’ve got good indexes to support your query, and statistics to help SQL Server guess how many rows will come back, how can SQL Server still come up with terribly incorrect row estimates? To demonstrate, I’ll use the 2018-06 version of the Stack Overflow database, but any recent version will work as long as…

When SQL Server is purely making an estimate up out of thin air, with no freakin’ idea what the real answer is, it doesn’t give you any kind of warning. It just produces an estimate that looks scientifically accurate – until you know how it’s actually getting calculated. Let’s ask SQL Server how many users have…

Sure you can – parameter sniffing is everywhere. Anytime that you have one piece of code that needs to handle a varying number of rows, you’re probably gonna have to worry about parameter sniffing. I’ll start with any Stack Overflow database and run a couple of non-parameterized update statements. I’m using literals here, not parameters:…

When you have a stored procedure or application query that has multiple queries inside of it, how can you tell which query to focus on? For starters, do NOT believe the percentages you see in execution plans. Let’s take a classic performance tuning issue: scalar functions. I’ll start with the Stack Overflow database – if…

Here’s how Books Online describes the Max Degree of Parallelism setting: You can use the max degree of parallelism option to limit the number of processors to use in parallel plan execution. And here’s what the SQL Server 2019 setup screen says: When an instance of SQL Server runs on a computer that has more…

Years ago, when troubleshooting performance, I stumbled across this Microsoft documentation on parallel query processing that says: Certain types of statements cannot be processed in parallel unless they contain clauses, however. For example, UPDATE, INSERT, and DELETE are not normally processed in parallel even if the related query meets the criteria. But if the UPDATE…