SQL ConstantCare® Population Report: Spring 2026
9 Comments
It’s time for our quarterly update of our SQL ConstantCare® population report, showing how quickly (or slowly) folks adopt new versions of SQL Server. There were only slight 1-2% shifts, nothing big:
- SQL Server 2025: 1%
- SQL Server 2022: 31%, up 2% from last quarter
- SQL Server 2019: 42%, down 1%
- SQL Server 2017: 9%, no change
- SQL Server 2016: 9%, down 1%
- SQL Server 2014 & prior: 6%, no change
- Azure SQL DB and Managed Instances: 2%, no change
SQL Server 2025’s 1% adoption rate might sound small, but it mirrors the adoption rate curves of 2019 and 2022 when those releases came out. It took 2019 a year to break 10% adoption, and it took 2022 a year and a half. I’ve grouped together 2014 & prior versions because they’re all unsupported, and 2016 will join them quickly in July when it goes out of extended support. (I can’t believe it’s been almost 10 years already!) Here’s how adoption is trending over time, with the most recent data at the right: 
The new stuff continues its steady push from the top down, driving down the old versions out of support.
How big are the servers out there?
How much total data is on each of the monitored servers?
- < 50GB: 31%
- 50-250GB: 23%
- 250GB-1TB: 23%
- 1-3TB: 12%
- >3TB: 11%
For a long time, the measure of a “very large database” was around 1 billion rows or 1 terabyte. These days, 23% of all SQL Servers out there have over 1TB, and 1 in 10 are over 3TB! Those numbers aren’t all that big in the grand scheme of things these days. Our jobs just keep getting more challenging as organizations continue to gather more data, and hold off on archival or purging. Some of the other interesting big numbers: we’ve got servers in the audience with >400TB data, 128-448 CPU cores, 2-6TB RAM, and thousands of databases. Y’all are putting that data to work!

























If your company is hiring, leave a comment. The rules:


















